Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Nutr Hosp ; 39(2): 393-397, 2022 Mar 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1701775

RESUMEN

Introduction: Objective: the association between vitamin D and COVID-19 severity is not consistent. We compared prevalences and analyzed the association between vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19 severity in Northeast Mexico. Methods: this was a cross-sectional study with individuals consecutively included at a referral diagnostic center during March-September 2020 (n = 181). Concurrently, every patient admitted to intensive care was also consecutively included (n = 116). Serum 25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL was considered vitamin D deficiency. Descriptive, ANOVA, and multivariate ordinal regression analyses were performed. Results: vitamin D deficiency prevalence was 63.8 % (95 % CI, 54.7, 72.0) in severe COVID-19; 25.6 % (95 % CI, 17.4, 36.0) in mild COVID-19; and 42.4 % (95 % CI, 33.2, 52.3) in non-diseased individuals. Vitamin D deficiency increased 5 times the odds of severe COVID-19 (95 % CI, 1.1, 24.3), independently of sex, age, body mass index, and inflammatory markers. Conclusions: this study is the first report of vitamin D deficiency in Northeast Mexico. Vitamin D deficiency was associated with COVID-19 severity.


Introducción: Objetivo: la asociación entre la vitamina D y la gravedad de la COVID-19 no es consistente. Se comparó la prevalencia y se analizó la asociación de la deficiencia de vitamina D con la gravedad de los pacientes con COVID-19 en el noreste de México. Métodos: este fue un estudio transversal. Se incluyó consecutivamente a individuos de un centro de diagnóstico de referencia durante marzo-septiembre de 2020 (n = 181). Paralelamente, se reclutó a todos los pacientes que ingresaron a cuidados intensivos en ese mismo periodo (n = 116). Se consideró que había deficiencia de vitamina D ante cifras de 25(OH)D sérica < 20 ng/ml. Se realizaron un análisis descriptivo, un ANOVA y una regresión ordinal multivariante. Resultados: la prevalencia de la deficiencia de vitamina D fue del 63,8 % (IC del 95 %: 54,7; 72,0) en la COVID-19 grave, del 25,6 % (IC del 95 %: 17,4; 36,0) en la COVID-19 leve y del 42,4 % (IC del 95 %: 33,2; 52,3) sin COVID-19. La deficiencia aumentó 5 veces las probabilidades de una COVID-19 grave (IC del 95 %: 1,1; 23,9) independientemente del sexo, la edad, el índice de masa corporal y los marcadores inflamatorios. Conclusiones: este estudio es el primer informe de la deficiencia de vitamina D en el noreste de México. La deficiencia de vitamina D se asoció con la gravedad de la COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Deficiencia de Vitamina D , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , México/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Vitamina D
2.
J Med Virol ; 93(10): 5873-5879, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1432420

RESUMEN

Population-based immunoglobulin G (IgG) seroprevalence studies in asymptomatic individuals in Latin America are scarce. The objective of the study was to estimate the prevalence and geographic distribution of IgG antibodies induced by natural SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic adults, 5-8 months after the first case was reported in a northeastern state of Mexico. This was a population-based cross-sectional study carried out in Nuevo Leon during August-November 2020. Individuals ≥18 years with no previous diagnosis or symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 were consecutively screened in one of the busiest subway stations. Also, a search for eligible individuals was done from house-to-house, after selecting densely populated geographic sectors of each of the municipalities of the metropolitan area (n = 4495). The IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein were analyzed. The IgG antibody positivity rate was 27.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25.8, 28.4); there were no differences by sex or age (p > 0.05). Analysis by month showed a gradual increase from 11.9% (August) to 31.9% (November); Week 39 had the highest positivity rate (42.2%, 95% CI: 34.2, 50.7). Most people did not have evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Preventive measures and promotion of the COVID-19 vaccine should be strengthened.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Adulto , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Proteínas de la Nucleocápside de Coronavirus/inmunología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fosfoproteínas/inmunología , Prevalencia , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos
3.
Viruses ; 13(7)2021 06 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1289019

RESUMEN

The progression and distribution of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic are continuously changing over time and can be traced by blood donors' serological survey. Here, we investigated the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in blood donors in Nuevo Leon, Mexico during 2020 as a strategy for the rapid evaluation of the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and asymptomatic case detection. We collected residual plasma samples from blood donors who attended two regional donation centers from January to December of 2020 to identify changes in anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG prevalence. Plasma samples were analyzed on the Abbott Architect instrument using the commercial Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG chemiluminescent assay. We found a total of 99 reactive samples from 2068 analyzed plasma samples, resulting in a raw prevalence of 4.87%. Donors aged 18-49 years were more likely to be seropositive compared to those aged >50 years (p < 0.001). Weekly seroprevalence increased from 1.8% during the early pandemic stage to 27.59% by the end of the year. Prevalence was 1.46-fold higher in females compared to males. Case geographical mapping showed that Monterrey city recorded the majority of SARS-CoV-2 cases. These results show that there is a growing trend of seroprevalence over time associated with asymptomatic infection that is unnoticed under the current epidemiological surveillance protocols.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Infecciones Asintomáticas/epidemiología , Donantes de Sangre , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Donantes de Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/transmisión , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Factores Sexuales , Adulto Joven
4.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 10730, 2021 05 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1242048

RESUMEN

Mexico took swift action and has strictly followed mitigation measures to prevent the spread of coronavirus disease, COVID-19. In this study we compared influenza activity indicators in our country after the implementation of public health measures for COVID-19. We compared indicators of influenza activity in 2020 before and after public health measures were taken to reduce COVID-19 with the corresponding indicators from three preceding years and the immediate one, and the potential decrease in seasonal influenza cases/deaths. Nationwide surveillance data revealed a drastic decline in influenza diagnosis in outpatient clinics and public hospitals, influenza positivity rates of clinical specimens, and confirmed severe cases during the following 10 weeks of 2020 as lockdown activities and control measures were established compared with the same period of 2019. Our results suggest that the measures taken for COVID-19 were effective in reducing the spread of other viral respiratory diseases as influenza in our country.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Salud Pública , COVID-19/patología , COVID-19/virología , Hospitales Públicos , Humanos , Incidencia , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , México/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación
5.
researchsquare; 2020.
Preprint en Inglés | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-113558.v1

RESUMEN

Mexico took swift action and has strictly followed mitigation measures to prevent the spread of coronavirus disease, COVID-19. The present study compared indicators of influenza activity in 2020 before and after public health measures were taken to reduce COVID-19 with the corresponding indicators from three preceding years and the immediate one, and the potential decrease in seasonal influenza cases. Nationwide surveillance data revealed a drastic decline in influenza diagnosis in outpatient clinics and public hospitals, positivity rates of clinical specimens, and confirmed severe cases during the following 10 weeks of 2020 as lockdown activities and control measures were established compared with the same period of 2019, suggesting that the measures taken for COVID-19 were effective in reducing the spread of other viral respiratory diseases in our country.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Enfermedades Respiratorias
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA